Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Turk J Med Sci ; 44(5): 713-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539535

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sensitive and cost-effective detection of point mutations is important in genetics research. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) is known to be one of the most sensitive techniques for point mutation detection. A more recent technique, high-resolution melting (HRM), is based on the melting behavior of PCR products. In this study, the efficiency and sensitivity of HRM and DHPLC for the detection of MEFV, F5, and F2 gene point mutations were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 15 patients with MEFV mutations (E148Q, M680I, M694V, or V726A), 7 patients with the F51691G>A mutation, and 12 patients with the F220210G>A mutation. All mutations were screened by HRM and DHPLC. RESULTS: All mutations were successfully detected by HRM. However, only 4 (MEFVE148Q and M680I, F51691G>A, and F220210G>A) of 6 mutations were successfully detected with DHPLC. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that HRM is more sensitive than DHPLC for detection of the studied point mutations.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Proteínas do Citoesqueleto/genética , Análise Mutacional de DNA/métodos , Mutação Puntual , Humanos , Desnaturação de Ácido Nucleico , Pirina
3.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 42(3): 154-7, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366412

RESUMO

Griscelli syndrome (GS) is an autosomal recessive disorder that is characterized by partial albinism of the skin and hair shaft. Prompt and early diagnosis is a crucial step for the follow up and management of GS, which would otherwise dramatically decrease the life expectancy of the patients. This case report presents the clinical course of a femoral fracture treated with closed reduction and pelvic-pedal cast, and progression of acute phase reaction during the follow up period.

4.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 41(5): 171-4, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366364

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the effects of parasacral and posterior Winnie approaches when combined with the inguinal paravascular approach for lumbar plexus block. METHODS: After the approval of the Ethics Committee, 40 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic knee surgery were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups in a double-blind manner to perform sciatic nerve block either by the parasacral technique (Group I) or by the posterior approach (Group II). RESULTS: The obturator nerve motor block success rate was found to be 80% (16/20) in Group I, whereas it was 10% (2/20) in Group II (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Inguinal paravascular block with parasacral sciatic nerve block led to a much higher incidence of obturator nerve motor block when compared to the inguinal paravascular block with posterior sciatic nerve block during knee arthroscopies.

5.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 66(5): 811-5, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21789385

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion on hemodynamic parameters, pain, sedation, and recovery score during oocyte retrieval. METHODS: Sixty-nine women were scheduled for oocyte retrieval. Target-controlled propofol infusion at an effect-site concentration of 1.5 µg/mL was instituted. The patients were randomly allocated to receive remifentanil at an effect-site concentration of either 1.5 (group I, n = 23), 2 (group II, n = 23) or 2.5 ng/mL (group III, n = 23). Hemodynamic variables, sedation, pain, the Aldrete recovery score, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables, sedation and pain scores and the number of patients with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 10 min after the procedure were comparable among the groups. The number of patients in group III with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 5 min after the procedure was significantly lower than that in groups I and II. One patient in group II and one patient in group III suffered from nausea. CONCLUSION: Similar pain-free conscious sedation conditions without significant changes in hemodynamic parameters were provided by all three protocols. However, target controlled infusion of remifentanil at 1.5 or 2 ng/mL proved superior at providing early recovery compared to 2.5 ng/mL.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Recuperação de Oócitos/métodos , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Propofol/efeitos adversos , Remifentanil
6.
Clinics ; 66(5): 811-815, 2011. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-593845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion on hemodynamic parameters, pain, sedation, and recovery score during oocyte retrieval. METHODS: Sixty-nine women were scheduled for oocyte retrieval. Target-controlled propofol infusion at an effectsite concentration of 1.5 μg/mL was instituted. The patients were randomly allocated to receive remifentanil at an effect-site concentration of either 1.5 (group I, n = 23), 2 (group II, n = 23) or 2.5 ng/mL (group III, n = 23). Hemodynamic variables, sedation, pain, the Aldrete recovery score, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables, sedation and pain scores and the number of patients with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 10 min after the procedure were comparable among the groups. The number of patients in group III with the maximum Aldrete recovery score 5 min after the procedure was significantly lower than that in groups I and II. One patient in group II and one patient in group III suffered from nausea. CONCLUSION: Similar pain-free conscious sedation conditions without significant changes in hemodynamic parameters were provided by all three protocols. However, target controlled infusion of remifentanil at 1.5 or 2 ng/mL proved superior at providing early recovery compared to 2.5 ng/mL.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Recuperação de Oócitos/métodos , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efeitos adversos , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Infusões Intravenosas , Dor Pós-Operatória , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Propofol/efeitos adversos
7.
J Anesth ; 24(3): 373-9, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20229001

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical properties of fentanyl versus remifentanil in a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol anesthesia regimen with bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. METHODS: Forty consenting patients scheduled for elective septorhinoplasty were prospectively studied as one of two groups: fentanyl (group F) or remifentanil (group R). After loading boluses of fentanyl 3 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) were administered, the continuous infusion of fentanyl or remifentanil was started at a rate of 0.03 or 0.15 microg kg(-1) min(-1), respectively. Propofol infusion was then commenced with a 3 microg ml(-1) effect site concentration (Ce) by means of a TCI device. The Ce propofol was adjusted to keep BIS at 50 +/- 10. RESULTS: The general mean value of propofol Ce for group F and group R was 4.0 and 3.5 microg ml(-1), respectively. As to the recovery profile, the eye opening time (mean, 6.7 vs. 4.6 min), extubation time (mean, 7.3 vs. 4.7 min), and orientation time (mean, 7.6 vs. 4.9 min) were found to be significantly longer in group F than in group R. CONCLUSION: We concluded that in propofol-based TCI anesthesia under BIS supervision for septorhinoplasty operations, remifentanil was better than fentanyl, especially with respect to emergence from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Furthermore, the durations of anesthesia and operation were rather short, which indicates that fentanyl can be safely used.


Assuntos
Anestesia Intravenosa , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Fentanila , Piperidinas , Propofol , Adulto , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletroencefalografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Sala de Recuperação , Remifentanil , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...